Join us and the lead editor of IRL, Mozilla's multi-award-winning podcast, for a behind-the-scenes look at the pod and to contribute your ideas for the next season, themed: "AI and ME." Mark your calendar and join our Community Call on Wednesday, Aug 7, 17:00–17:45 UTC. See you there!

Vyhľadajte odpoveď

Vyhnite sa podvodom s podporou. Nikdy vás nebudeme žiadať, aby ste zavolali alebo poslali SMS na telefónne číslo alebo zdieľali osobné informácie. Nahláste prosím podozrivú aktivitu použitím voľby “Nahlásiť zneužitie”.

Ďalšie informácie

Message filter rules and junk training/logging

  • 1 odpoveď
  • 1 má tento problém
  • 16 zobrazení
  • Posledná odpoveď od Matt

more options

I recently started getting a huge amount of junk emails. The junk settings were missing most of these. I got tired of point-and-click manually identifying these messages as junk so I added a message filter rule that 1) identifies words in the body, 2) sets junk status to junk, 3) moves messages to junk on local folders, and 4) "white lists" good messages with the same words in the body. I do not see messages that my message filter rule catches in the adaptive junk filter log. Is Thunderbird's adaptive junk filter learning from the messages that my message filter rule is catching, yes/no?

I recently started getting a huge amount of junk emails. The junk settings were missing most of these. I got tired of point-and-click manually identifying these messages as junk so I added a message filter rule that 1) identifies words in the body, 2) sets junk status to junk, 3) moves messages to junk on local folders, and 4) "white lists" good messages with the same words in the body. I do not see messages that my message filter rule catches in the adaptive junk filter log. Is Thunderbird's adaptive junk filter learning from the messages that my message filter rule is catching, yes/no?

Všetky odpovede (1)

more options

Steve H said

2) sets junk status to junk, Is Thunderbird's adaptive junk filter learning from the messages that my message filter rule is catching, yes/no?

Yes