Join us and the lead editor of IRL, Mozilla's multi-award-winning podcast, for a behind-the-scenes look at the pod and to contribute your ideas for the next season, themed: "AI and ME." Mark your calendar and join our Community Call on Wednesday, Aug 7, 17:00–17:45 UTC. See you there!

Avatar for Username

Поиск в Поддержке

Избегайте мошенников, выдающих себя за службу поддержки. Мы никогда не попросим вас позвонить, отправить текстовое сообщение или поделиться личной информацией. Сообщайте о подозрительной активности, используя функцию «Пожаловаться».

Подробнее

sec_error_bad_signature vs. sec_error_untrusted_issuer

  • 2 ответа
  • 256 имеют эту проблему
  • 2 просмотра
  • Последний ответ от SCGR

more options

When attempting to visit my SSL secured server (which uses a self-signed cert) on my local network, I get sec_error_bad_signature with no further usable information. However, when visiting my router config page, which also uses a self-signed cert, I get sec_error_untrusted_issuer which allows me to make an exception.

Is there any way to get a more verbose and useful error message from Firefox so I can figure out exactly why Firefox 3.6 will allow me to accept one self-signed cert while not allowing me to accept another?

When attempting to visit my SSL secured server (which uses a self-signed cert) on my local network, I get sec_error_bad_signature with no further usable information. However, when visiting my router config page, which also uses a self-signed cert, I get sec_error_untrusted_issuer which allows me to make an exception. Is there any way to get a more verbose and useful error message from Firefox so I can figure out exactly why Firefox 3.6 will allow me to accept one self-signed cert while not allowing me to accept another?

Все ответы (2)

more options

the same, want to know reason and solution. thanks.

more options

What worked for me was to use a self-signed certificate, instead of using a certificate that was signed by some other self-signed certificate.