Where did you install Firefox from? Help Mozilla uncover 3rd party websites that offer problematic Firefox installation by taking part in our campaign. There will be swag, and you'll be featured in our blog if you manage to report at least 10 valid reports!

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

Learn More

Why no Firefox 4 support for CentOs 5?

  • 7 个回答
  • 311 人有此问题
  • 9 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 Gary

more options

CentOS 5 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5) is still a widely used enterprise version of Linux. Why has Firefox 4 been built to exclude all the enterprise users based on that version of Linux?

CentOS 5 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5) is still a widely used enterprise version of Linux. Why has Firefox 4 been built to exclude all the enterprise users based on that version of Linux?

所有回复 (7)

more options

As it turns out, I'm posting this on Firefox 4 via RHEL 5.4. It is possible, and I would highly recommend visiting http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2075033 for instructions on getting it running. I can try and help if people have specific issues, but this worked for me.

由dj_bushido于修改

more options

Sigh, even the site you point to has an extensive discussion on why Firefox should have support for enterprise systems. We can't expect (nor, for that matter, allow) all users to go through the steps to hack their systems so that they can use Firefox. After all Firefox 4 is supported on XP and it's older than CentOS 5. What is the message that Mozilla is sending to world?

more options

Oh, and when you follow the instructions in http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2075033 you still get:

./firefox-bin: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so)

So even if we gave this to our users they would still be unable to use it.

more options

Posing a link to a page that rehashes the same non-solution as the one already posted here is not very helpful.

Let's just be honest and admit that Firefox 4.0 is only really meant for enterprise Windows users. Individuals who use Linux at home are probably thrilled with it as well. But for the enterprise Linux users, stay on 3.6 -- hopefully they will patch any critical security issues that arise..

more options

Again, I have Firefox working on RHEL 5.4 (full Flash support and everything). The above mozillazine forum post fixed it up for me, what problems are you having? I'm not giving up (on love)...

more options

See my message from 4 days ago. Even after following the instructions I still get the ./firefox-bin: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so)

However this is a bigger issue than my not getting it to work. In an enterprise situation it is not a "simple" matter of copying some library and then it all works. The tools have to be qualified and security needs to be maintained. Even if most enterprise users understood the instructions the IT group gets very nervous when it has to copy a non-standard library. Trying to sell that to the group is rather hard. The decision to abandon CentOS 5 for firefox 4 was most unfortunate, especially as it was working for most of the beta test period.