Where did you install Firefox from? Help Mozilla uncover 3rd party websites that offer problematic Firefox installation by taking part in our campaign. There will be swag, and you'll be featured in our blog if you manage to report at least 10 valid reports!

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

Learn More

FLAW | BREACH | BUG - Setting privacy.resistFingerprinting to TRUE changes Resolution from 1920x1080x24 to 1920x968x24

  • 3 个回答
  • 0 人有此问题
  • 1 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 zeroknight

more options

Im trying to halt fingerprint tracking, whoever designed Firefox's privacy.resistFingerprinting rule makes fingerprinting even more prevalent.

With privacy.resistFingerprinting set to FALSE, my resolution is reported : 1920x1080x24, set to TRUE its 1920x968x24

1 in 6 browsers has resolution 1920x1080x24 1 in 6000 browsers has resolution 1920x968x24

Who in Firefox decided this config rule? and what is the logic behind it? Looks like intentional sabotage to make peoples browsers more trackable.

Whilst leaving resistFingerprinting set to TRUE, How can I force my resolution to the more generic 1920x1080x24?

Is there another setting in about:config I can change? if there isnt, where can I request this feature? Id rather not resort to an extention for something so small like this.

Im trying to halt fingerprint tracking, whoever designed Firefox's privacy.resistFingerprinting rule makes fingerprinting even more prevalent. With privacy.resistFingerprinting set to FALSE, my resolution is reported : 1920x1080x24, set to TRUE its 1920x968x24 1 in 6 browsers has resolution 1920x1080x24 1 in 6000 browsers has resolution 1920x968x24 Who in Firefox decided this config rule? and what is the logic behind it? Looks like intentional sabotage to make peoples browsers more trackable. Whilst leaving resistFingerprinting set to TRUE, How can I force my resolution to the more generic 1920x1080x24? Is there another setting in about:config I can change? if there isnt, where can I request this feature? Id rather not resort to an extention for something so small like this.

所有回复 (3)

more options

You are not meant to use maximized windows with RFP, this is why they are created unmaximized.

Fingerprinters check the whole browser fingerprint and never just one thing like screen size alone. All those 1080p screen users without RFP are uniquely identifiable by other means but this is not reflected in the statistic. You are better off with RFP even if it increases your uniqueness in these kinds of tests.

有帮助吗?

more options

zeroknight, your reply makes zero sense.

Firstly, I am aware fingerprinting is a collection of attributes.

Secondly, The "Other things"(aka attributes) point you raised in your post are irrelevant, however, they actually only makes your point worse - By making our browser resolution more identifiable, you are creating overall more uniqueness in the total set of "things".

Fingerprinting relies upon noticing "things"(attributes) that deviate from the generic.

Its a statistical fact that most PC/Laptop users operate in full screen mode within a range of common resolutions, Thus by matching this its harder to uniquely fingerprint us.

I backed up this point in my first post with factual stats.

1 in 6 browsers has resolution 1920x1080x24 1 in 6000 browsers has resolution 1920x968x24

RFP is working counter productively - We want to blend with the 1 in 6 group, but RFP is pushing us into 1 in 6000 group.

由Lee于修改

有帮助吗?

more options

Fingerprinting protection does not make you blend in, it is like wearing a Guy Fawkes mask in public. The details of the mask are unimportant as long as everyone wears the same mask.

有帮助吗?

我要提问

您需要登录才能回复。如果您还没账号,可以提出新问题