Where did you install Firefox from? Help Mozilla uncover 3rd party websites that offer problematic Firefox installation by taking part in our campaign. There will be swag, and you'll be featured in our blog if you manage to report at least 10 valid reports!

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

Learn More

Firefox 33 broke our enterprise application. What to use instead of window.crypto.signText or how to downgrade to FireFox 32?

more options

There is nothing suitable to sign content in your current implementation of webcrypto specification. Firefox 33 total breaks signing content with client certificates and leaves us with few options: either tell thousands of clients to switch to IE or downgrade to Firefox 32. How can we download to Firefox 32? How do we sign text with new/future webcrypto api?

There is nothing suitable to sign content in your current implementation of webcrypto specification. Firefox 33 total breaks signing content with client certificates and leaves us with few options: either tell thousands of clients to switch to IE or downgrade to Firefox 32. How can we download to Firefox 32? How do we sign text with new/future webcrypto api?

所有回复 (4)

more options

There is a bug on file to address this that you can vote to get fixed:

I don't know of any short-term workarounds, but you could consider using the extended support release (ESR) designed for corporate environments. It is the Firefox 31 code base with additional security patches.

https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/organizations/faq/

more options
more options

Thank you! I'll upvote it, but I'd rather see this change rolled back or at least some quick fix to temporarily enable the lost functionality should be made available. We are offering a service to many individual customers who now should just uninstall 33, install Firefox 32 and disable the auto-update. Using ESR makes no difference. I understand you want to remove legacy code, but that cleaning should have been made after there is an alternative running.

more options

From a security perspective, it would be better advice to your customers to use the latest version of IE for your application rather that install a known vulnerable version of Firefox and potentially block updates for the rest of time. I think that's a level of potential liability you wouldn't want to take on.

Also, I'm surprised that the ESR version doesn't work. Usually this kind of change would not be included until the next major release.