Pesquisar no site de suporte

Evite golpes de suporte. Nunca pedimos que você ligue ou envie uma mensagem de texto para um número de telefone, ou compartilhe informações pessoais. Denuncie atividades suspeitas usando a opção “Denunciar abuso”.

Saiba mais

Esta discussão foi arquivada. Faça uma nova pergunta se precisa de ajuda.

Bug in Plugin Check's status report for Adobe Flash

  • 2 respostas
  • 7 têm este problema
  • 2 visualizações
  • Última resposta de doedoejohn

more options

Plugin Status (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/) says "Shockwave Flash 15.0 r0" "Up to Date 15.0.0.152". This is incorrect. The latest version of Flash (as of 11/11/2014) is 15.0.0.223, as reported by Adobe's Test Page. Therefore, the status should say "Vulnerable".

I am using Firefox ESR 31.2.0 without any addons on a Windows 7 64-bit PC.

Thank you and keep up the good work!

Ed

Plugin Status (https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/) says "Shockwave Flash 15.0 r0" "Up to Date 15.0.0.152". This is incorrect. The latest version of Flash (as of 11/11/2014) is 15.0.0.223, as reported by Adobe's Test Page. Therefore, the status should say "Vulnerable". I am using Firefox ESR 31.2.0 without any addons on a Windows 7 64-bit PC. Thank you and keep up the good work! Ed

Todas as respostas (2)

more options

Mine says "Up to Date 15.0.0.189" which as you point out also is incorrect.

A bug has been filed for this, but I can't tell whether the problem has been fully diagnosed and anyone is going to pick up the ball and run with it:

1084537 – Flash sometimes displayed as up to date whilst vulnerable, on Windows 7

While it's generally not helpful to add comments to bugs (unless you can help fix them), you can register on the Bugzilla site and "vote" for them to be fixed. See: Voting, Bugzilla Etiquette.

Edit: For some reason, this bug doesn't allow voting.

Alterado por jscher2000 - Support Volunteer em

more options

Thank you for opening the bug report ! I see some very interesting investigation and discussions going on already.

This issue is not a show-stopper, but it's a great feature to have.