Where did you install Firefox from? Help Mozilla uncover 3rd party websites that offer problematic Firefox installation by taking part in our campaign. There will be swag, and you'll be featured in our blog if you manage to report at least 10 valid reports!

Hilfe durchsuchen

Vorsicht vor Support-Betrug: Wir fordern Sie niemals auf, eine Telefonnummer anzurufen, eine SMS an eine Telefonnummer zu senden oder persönliche Daten preiszugeben. Bitte melden Sie verdächtige Aktivitäten über die Funktion „Missbrauch melden“.

Learn More

Mozilla Firefox Disables "Multirow Bookmark Toolbar" Customization (Userchrome.css) in Firefox 67 Beta 4

  • 2 Antworten
  • 1 hat dieses Problem
  • 23 Aufrufe
  • Letzte Antwort von tempest21

more options

Mozilla? Major FAIL! The one thing that worked for me was the ability to customize a userchrome.css so that I could get the multirow toolbar to work through a customized "userchrome.css" file. CONGRATS (spoken with sarcasm) on releasing a new version of Firefox that completely ignores the userchrome.css file.

My current userchrome.css files looks like this:

/* Multi-Row Bookmarks Toolbar */

  1. PersonalToolbar {

/* Provide room for up to 4 rows at 26px */ max-height: 115px !important; }

  1. PlacesToolbarItems > box {

display: inline-block !important; }

  1. PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems {

/* Override hiding */ overflow-x: visible !important; overflow-y: visible !important; /* Add a little cushion */ padding-bottom: 1px; }

  1. PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems .bookmark-item {

/* Reduce padding on individual bookmarks to fit rows closer together */ padding-top: 1px !important; padding-bottom: 1px !important; } .tabbrowser-tab::before, .tabbrowser-tab::after{

 display: none !important;

} toolbarbutton.bookmark-item {

font-size:13px !important;

}

It no longer works as Firefox 67 completely ignores the file. If anyone has a suggestion, I'm all ears. Otherwise, I'll be dumping Firefox (after being a user for some 15+ years and switching to another web browser. Mozilla keeps removing vital functions of Firefox to make it less user friendly then it was before.

Mozilla? Major FAIL! The one thing that worked for me was the ability to customize a userchrome.css so that I could get the multirow toolbar to work through a customized "userchrome.css" file. CONGRATS (spoken with sarcasm) on releasing a new version of Firefox that completely ignores the userchrome.css file. My current userchrome.css files looks like this: /* Multi-Row Bookmarks Toolbar */ #PersonalToolbar { /* Provide room for up to 4 rows at 26px */ max-height: 115px !important; } #PlacesToolbarItems > box { display: inline-block !important; } #PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems { /* Override hiding */ overflow-x: visible !important; overflow-y: visible !important; /* Add a little cushion */ padding-bottom: 1px; } #PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems .bookmark-item { /* Reduce padding on individual bookmarks to fit rows closer together */ padding-top: 1px !important; padding-bottom: 1px !important; } .tabbrowser-tab::before, .tabbrowser-tab::after{ display: none !important; } toolbarbutton.bookmark-item { font-size:13px !important; } It no longer works as Firefox 67 completely ignores the file. If anyone has a suggestion, I'm all ears. Otherwise, I'll be dumping Firefox (after being a user for some 15+ years and switching to another web browser. Mozilla keeps removing vital functions of Firefox to make it less user friendly then it was before.

Alle Antworten (2)

more options

This didn't affect you when you were using Firefox 66? There was a structural change to the bar and it's easy to find new style recipes now. For example:

https://www.reddit.com/r/FirefoxCSS/comments/b346fz/firefox_66_destroyed_my_more_toolbars_fix/

https://www.userchrome.org/what-is-userchrome-css.html#multirowbookmarks

more options

It really didn't when I upgraded to Firefox 66. Don't know why. But thanks for posting that link. It worked perfectly. There are certain links that I have in my toolbar and it's become an important feature of Firefox for me. Thanks for the reference link.