Where did you install Firefox from? Help Mozilla uncover 3rd party websites that offer problematic Firefox installation by taking part in our campaign. There will be swag, and you'll be featured in our blog if you manage to report at least 10 valid reports!

Hilfe durchsuchen

Vorsicht vor Support-Betrug: Wir fordern Sie niemals auf, eine Telefonnummer anzurufen, eine SMS an eine Telefonnummer zu senden oder persönliche Daten preiszugeben. Bitte melden Sie verdächtige Aktivitäten über die Funktion „Missbrauch melden“.

Learn More

fascist style control of addons is a bad thing and prevents dev's from getting there add-ons out there.

  • 4 Antworten
  • 1 hat dieses Problem
  • 5 Aufrufe
  • Letzte Antwort von the-edmeister

more options

fascist style control of addons is a bad thing and prevents dev's from getting there add-ons out there.

doing this will only stifle creativity and prevent new addons from being made.

fascist style control of addons is a bad thing and prevents dev's from getting there add-ons out there. doing this will only stifle creativity and prevent new addons from being made.

Ausgewählte Lösung

Heavyoak said

fascist style control of addons is a bad thing and prevents dev's from getting there add-ons out there. doing this will only stifle creativity and prevent new addons from being made.

How does this strike you? https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/08/21/the-future-of-developing-firefox-add-ons/

"We are implementing a new extension API, called WebExtensions ..."

The current extensions infrastructure will be gone and along with it will be the current extensibility advantage that Firefox has had over Chrome and Opera. Kind of like trading "fascism" for "communism".

So by the end of next year we may be moaning over something a lot larger that the current "signing" minor schism or "bump in the road".

Diese Antwort im Kontext lesen 👍 1

Alle Antworten (4)

more options

This doesn't sound like a support question. You can give feedback on the current Firefox and request changes for future versions on the following site:

https://input.mozilla.org/feedback/firefox

more options

Ausgewählte Lösung

Heavyoak said

fascist style control of addons is a bad thing and prevents dev's from getting there add-ons out there. doing this will only stifle creativity and prevent new addons from being made.

How does this strike you? https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/08/21/the-future-of-developing-firefox-add-ons/

"We are implementing a new extension API, called WebExtensions ..."

The current extensions infrastructure will be gone and along with it will be the current extensibility advantage that Firefox has had over Chrome and Opera. Kind of like trading "fascism" for "communism".

So by the end of next year we may be moaning over something a lot larger that the current "signing" minor schism or "bump in the road".

more options

so there going to force over a change to unreliable javascript because they hate everyone...


wow... just wow.

time to see if I can transfer over all my current firefox stuff to pale moon.

more options

Mozilla is on a mission - a mission to make Firefox great or dead. I think they may succeed with the latter.

You may want to look into SeaMonkey and try the SeaFox extension on it, which make it look more like the most recent versions of Firefox (but sans the signing 'feature' and the 'new' Search Bar scheme).

IMO, PaleMoon uses the absolute worst UI that Mozilla ever came up with for Firefox. It was like they didn't have the guts to make a proper Firefox button for all the menu items; sometimes users had to open both the orange Firefox button and show the Menu bar to find the option / preference that they wanted to access.